Golfers' Tort Liability - A Critique of an Emerging Standard

Authors

Daniel E. Lazaroff

Abstract

This article argues that the recklessness standard applied by most contemporary courts to tort claims initiated by one sports participant against a co-participant is inappropriate in the context of golf. Rather, Professor Lazaroff asserts that golf is an activity in which a negligence standard should apply and that this lower threshold for liability can be utilized without chilling participation or altering the inherent nature of the sport. In sum, the recklessness standard generally used for more active or contact sports is unnecessary in the more passive and genteel setting of golf competition.

Recommended Citation

Daniel E. Lazaroff, Golfers' Tort Liability - A Critique of an Emerging Standard, 24 UC Law SF Comm. & Ent. L.J. 317 (2002).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol24/iss3/1