Alternatives to the Fairness Doctrine: Structural Limits Should Replace Content Controls

Authors

Christopher A. Hilen

Abstract

The abolition of the Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission provides an opportunity to reexamine the way in which broadcasters are encouraged to offer programming on controversial issues of public importance. The author outlines alternatives to the Fairness Doctrine and subjects each to a Fair Treatment Test, which requires that the alternative 1) guarantee that the public will receive programming on controversials of importance to it, and 2) provide full first amendment rights to broadcasters. The author concludes that a structural approach to broadcast regulation, under which stricter crossownership limits than presently exist are imposed on broadcasters, offers the best possibility of meeting the Fair Treatment Test, thereby providing both viewers and broadcasters with full first amendment rights.

Recommended Citation

Christopher A. Hilen, Alternatives to the Fairness Doctrine: Structural Limits Should Replace Content Controls, 11 UC Law SF Comm. & Ent. L.J. 291 (1988).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol11/iss2/3