UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Abstract
California Civil Code section 48a limits recovery in defamation suits against newspapers to special damages, unless the plaintiff has unsuccessfully demanded a retraction from the media defendant The seminal case on this issue, Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc., failed to provide a clear test of what constitutes newspaper status. The author argues that the resulting uncertainty has precipitated a chilling effect on media. In addition, the author contends that modern libel litigation rarely fulfills plaintiffs' objectives and that a broader retraction statute would be a step toward better serving both plaintiffs and defendants in libel cases.
Recommended Citation
Catherine M. Bump,
What is a Newspaper under California's Retraction Statute - Enquiring Minds Want to Know,
10 UC Law SF Comm. & Ent. L.J. 795
(1988).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol10/iss3/3
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons