UC Law Business Journal
Abstract
The taxation of debt modifications is a complex and crucial area of tax law, significantly impacting both corporate finance and the broader economy. This article explores the complex legal and economic implications of modifying debt instruments, focusing on the key provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and covers the foundational principle of “realization,” which governs the recognition of income, gain, or loss when a debt modification is deemed significant under Treasury Regulation § 1.1001-3. The article delves into the tax consequences for both debtors and creditors, highlighting the potential for Cancellation of Debt Income and the challenges of managing gain or loss recognition. The discussion further examines the interplay between debt modifications and other IRC provisions, including the limitations imposed by IRC Section 163(j) on interest deductions and the restrictions under IRC Section 382 following ownership changes. The complexities introduced by the lack of updated guidance under IRC Section 385, which distinguishes debt from equity, are also addressed, underscoring the uncertainty faced by taxpayers in navigating these regulations. In addition to the statutory analysis, the article places the discussion within the broader economic context, considering the impact of rising global debt levels and economic instability. The role of tax policy in either facilitating or hindering debt restructuring efforts is critically assessed, with a focus on the need for clear and adaptable regulatory frameworks. Ultimately, this article argues that the current tax treatment of debt modifications, while necessary for maintaining tax revenue, must be carefully balanced against the economic realities faced by distressed businesses. The article concludes with a call for ongoing legislative and regulatory refinement to ensure that tax law supports both legal certainty and economic resilience.
Recommended Citation
Doron Narotzki,
When Debt Gets a Makeover, Taxes Follow,
21 Hastings Bus. L.J. 85
(2024).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol21/iss1/5