UC Law Journal
Abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine learning have found their way into the classroom. The use of artificial intelligence proctoring services (“AIPS”) has risen over the past few years with little consideration for the legal and ethical consequences of their implementation. Issues such as invasion of privacy and bias often get overlooked in favor of preconceived notions of fairness and infallibility associated with the concepts of AI and machine learning. These ethical concerns are especially magnified if AIPS are used in a K-12 setting. This Note, through a lens of AI ethics, recommends a two-pronged approach that creates an educational privacy right and provides concrete guidance for schools. Given that there are viable alternatives, AIPS should be implemented only after careful consideration, if at all.
Recommended Citation
Samantha Mita,
AI Proctoring: Academic Integrity vs. Student Rights,
74 Hastings L.J. 1513
(2023).
Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol74/iss5/10